← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason McAloon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 NAHL 37 7 3 10 0.270 0.1004 0.0986 0.2862 0.2812
2010-11 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 55 17 13 30 0.545 0.2025 0.1886 0.5776 0.5381
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 9 7 16 0.593
2013-14 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 26 9 9 18 0.692
2012-13 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 27 7 15 22 0.815
2011-12 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 11 9 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2011-12 · Lake Forest
+489.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25932
Forward overall
#1069
Forward born in 1990
#2893
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.