| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | — | NAHL | 37 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0.270 | 0.1004 | 0.0986 | 0.2862 | 0.2812 |
| 2010-11 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 55 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 0.545 | 0.2025 | 0.1886 | 0.5776 | 0.5381 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SR | 27 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.593 |
| 2013-14 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | JR | 26 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.692 |
| 2012-13 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | SO | 27 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 0.815 |
| 2011-12 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | FR | 26 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 0.769 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.