IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua McCully Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Seguin Bruins OJHL 49 2 6 8 0.163 0.0456 0.0457 0.1127 0.1130
2008-09 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 45 8 32 40 0.889 0.1499 0.1450 0.3693 0.3573
2009-10 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 25 6 15 21 0.840 0.1416 0.1313 0.3490 0.3237
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 27 1 7 8 0.296
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 15 1 3 4 0.267
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 25 0 16 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2010-11 · Westfield State
+395.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12065
Defenseman overall
#1405
Defenseman born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.