| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 38 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.316 | 0.1160 | 0.1195 | 0.3333 | 0.3433 |
| 2012-13 | Lloydminster Bobcats | AJHL | 39 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.487 | 0.1634 | 0.1578 | 0.4509 | 0.4354 |
| 2013-14 | Melville Millionaires | SJHL | 54 | 20 | 26 | 46 | 0.852 | 0.2183 | 0.2029 | 0.6422 | 0.5969 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | SR | 25 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 0.800 |
| 2016-17 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | JR | 26 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.731 |
| 2015-16 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | SO | 18 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.778 |
| 2014-15 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | FR | 27 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.630 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.