IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Drapluk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 12 18 30 0.577 0.2245 0.2173 0.8413 0.8142
2014-15 Surrey Eagles BCHL 57 18 26 44 0.772 0.3004 0.2767 1.1257 1.0370
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 29 10 6 16 0.552
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 27 8 4 12 0.444
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 28 7 9 16 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2015-16 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+163.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12886
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 1994
#1054
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.