| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 32 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0.562 | 0.3582 | 0.3751 | 1.6856 | 1.7652 |
| 2012-13 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 55 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 0.527 | 0.3358 | 0.3338 | 1.5802 | 1.5707 |
| 2013-14 | — | USHL | 52 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 0.558 | 0.3551 | 0.3364 | 1.6713 | 1.5831 |
| 2014-15 | — | USHL | 53 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.415 | 0.2643 | 0.2374 | 1.2439 | 1.1171 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Arizona State | D1 | — | SR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2017-18 | Arizona State | D1 | — | JR | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 |
| 2016-17 | Arizona State | D1 | — | SO | 19 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.263 |
| 2015-16 | Arizona State | D1 | — | FR | 24 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.208 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.