← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Rowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 32 2 16 18 0.562 0.3582 0.3751 1.6856 1.7652
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 16 13 29 0.527 0.3358 0.3338 1.5802 1.5707
2013-14 USHL 52 20 9 29 0.558 0.3551 0.3364 1.6713 1.5831
2014-15 USHL 53 13 9 22 0.415 0.2643 0.2374 1.2439 1.1171
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Arizona State D1 SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Arizona State D1 JR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2016-17 Arizona State D1 SO 19 4 1 5 0.263
2015-16 Arizona State D1 FR 24 3 2 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Arizona State
-12.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9816
Forward overall
#399
Forward born in 1994
#1562
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.