IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Depp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Soo Eagles NOJHL 49 22 39 61 1.245 0.2120 0.2186 0.5276 0.5439
2010-11 Soo Eagles NOJHL 50 28 45 73 1.460 0.2486 0.2431 0.6187 0.6051
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 48 40 45 85 1.771 0.3016 0.2789 0.7505 0.6941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 26 12 12 24 0.923
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 11 7 18 0.667
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 22 6 8 14 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2012-13 · Elmira
+181.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10905
Forward overall
#418
Forward born in 1991
#15
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trent Krueger
Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McCann
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.