IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — USHL 59 20 11 31 0.525 0.3230 0.3208 1.5479 1.5374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 36 7 7 14 0.389
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 36 6 1 7 0.194
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 6 7 13 0.394
2013-14 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 34 5 7 12 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · Maine
+28.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13638
Forward overall
#570
Forward born in 1994
#1350
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schmidt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dougherty
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.