IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dom Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.0343 0.0343 0.0814 0.0814
2019-20 St. Marks NE-Prep 27 14 14 28 1.037 0.1991 0.1991 0.4725 0.4725
2021-22 St. Marks NE-Prep 26 12 38 50 1.923 0.3692 0.3692 0.8762 0.8762
2022-23 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0771 0.0769 0.2906 0.2900
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 27 11 30 41 1.518
2024-25 New England D3 — — 27 16 18 34 1.259
2023-24 New England D3 — — 23 4 15 19 0.826
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2023-24 · New England
+398.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8188
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Damien Dangueuger
Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Brown
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel McNamara
Saint John's · 2011-12
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.