IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damien Dangueuger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-30 Country: France
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 41 3 16 19 0.463 0.0362 0.0373 0.1046 0.1078
2016-17 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0143 0.0147 0.0327 0.0337
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 48 8 16 24 0.500 0.1073 0.1045 0.2449 0.2385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2020-21 Western New England D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 1 1 2 0.087
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17940
Defenseman overall
#2312
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Fasig
Hobart · 2021-22
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Rahn
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley See
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.