IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Richard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 20 1 2 3 0.150 0.0297 0.0297 0.0683 0.0683
2022-23 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 52 12 19 31 0.596 0.2431 0.2353 0.4792 0.4639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 14 2 3 5 0.357
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26605
Forward overall
#1500
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bax
Utica · 2023-24
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.