IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Richard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 20 1 2 3 0.150 0.0289 0.0289 0.0686 0.0686
2022-23 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.0772 0.0772 0.1830 0.1830
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 52 12 19 31 0.596 0.1378 0.1334 0.4821 0.4667
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 — SO 14 2 3 5 0.357
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28632
Forward overall
#1648
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Camden Markham
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eliot Grauer
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor McBride
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.