IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Congdon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 44 23 41 64 1.454 0.1753 0.1787 0.4595 0.4684
2016-17 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 47 41 41 82 1.745 0.2102 0.2036 0.5512 0.5340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — JR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 23 10 4 14 0.609
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 21 8 10 18 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+416.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20744
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 1997
#174
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Post
Adrian · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Michelcavage
Concordia Wisconsin · 2010-11
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.