IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Congdon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 44 23 41 64 1.454 0.1825 0.1860 0.4592 0.4681
2016-17 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 47 41 41 82 1.745 0.2190 0.2122 0.5508 0.5336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D1 — JR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — JR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D1 — SO 23 10 4 14 0.609
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 23 10 4 14 0.609
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 21 8 10 18 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+396.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10667
Forward overall
#486
Forward born in 1997
#96
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gratz
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Post
Adrian · 2014-15
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.