IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Nenadal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0885 0.0931 0.4162 0.4380
2012-13 — USHL 44 5 8 13 0.295 0.1882 0.1880 0.8855 0.8847
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 55 3 6 9 0.164 0.1042 0.0992 0.4903 0.4669
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 53 8 12 20 0.377 0.2403 0.2170 1.1310 1.0215
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 27 9 9 18 0.667
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 20 2 2 4 0.200
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 35 3 4 7 0.200
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 38 5 1 6 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2015-16 · Lake Superior State
+8.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22157
Forward overall
#887
Forward born in 1994
#2986
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.