← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Bartfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.0456 0.0456 0.0874 0.0874
2020-21 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 19 14 18 32 1.684 0.2132 0.2132 0.4091 0.4091
2021-22 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.1215 0.1215 0.2332 0.2332
2022-23 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 27 24 27 51 1.889 0.2391 0.2391 0.4588 0.4588
2023-24 Austin Bruins NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0536 0.1508 0.1540
2024-25 Ogden Mustangs NCDC 53 13 25 38 0.717 0.2923 0.2839 0.5763 0.5598
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 12 1 5 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Skidmore
+204.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8886
Forward overall
#333
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.