IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Ford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1274 0.1276 0.5993 0.6003
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 51 10 12 22 0.431 0.2747 0.2623 1.2928 1.2345
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 33 1 7 8 0.242
2014-15 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 26 1 0 1 0.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2014-15 · Wisconsin
-78.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11982
Forward overall
#492
Forward born in 1994
#1866
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Eruzione
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.