IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Giorgio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0501 0.0497 0.1440 0.1429
2018-19 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 19 38 57 1.239 0.1555 0.1446 0.3912 0.3637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 25 6 10 16 0.640
2021-22 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 27 10 6 16 0.593
2020-21 Bethel D1 MIAC SO 8 5 3 8 1.000
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 8 5 3 8 1.000
2019-20 Bethel D1 MIAC FR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 3 10 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · Bethel
+469.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18937
Forward overall
#900
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Lake
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Lee
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Real
Adrian · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.