IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Lake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0302 0.0302 0.0783 0.0783
2020-21 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 37 4 26 30 0.811 0.1061 0.1061 0.2752 0.2752
2021-22 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 43 5 26 31 0.721 0.0943 0.0932 0.2447 0.2418
2022-23 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 44 5 35 40 0.909 0.1189 0.1116 0.3085 0.2896
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3858
Defenseman overall
#1005
Defenseman born in 2002
#1211
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Hoy
Adrian · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Demetri Sakaris
Southern Maine · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Robinson
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.