← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 28 5 11 16 0.571 0.1149 0.1149 0.2613 0.2613
2021-22 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 23 7 7 14 0.609 0.1224 0.1224 0.2784 0.2784
2022-23 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 31 6 7 13 0.419 0.0714 0.0697 0.1777 0.1735
2023-24 — NOJHL 49 20 35 55 1.122 0.1911 0.1766 0.4757 0.4397
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE — 27 3 4 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2024-25 · Suffolk
+126.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32812
Forward overall
#1962
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.