IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 41 3 9 12 0.293 0.1075 0.1068 0.3089 0.3068
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 60 7 22 29 0.483 0.1776 0.1675 0.5101 0.4811
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 1 9 10 0.357
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 25 5 10 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2013-14 · Adrian
+343.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9587
Defenseman overall
#1312
Defenseman born in 1992
#3409
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hendrickson
Concordia · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
Curry · 2013-14
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Mecrones
University of New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.