IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 41 3 9 12 0.293 0.1087 0.1080 0.3099 0.3078
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 60 7 22 29 0.483 0.1794 0.1692 0.5117 0.4826
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 1 9 10 0.357
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 25 5 10 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2013-14 · Adrian
+339.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7092
Defenseman overall
#1193
Defenseman born in 1992
#3193
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hendrickson
Concordia · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
Curry · 2013-14
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.