| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 47 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.085 | 0.0246 | 0.0257 | 0.0641 | 0.0670 |
| 2012-13 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Connecticut RoughRiders | EHL | 43 | 17 | 21 | 38 | 0.884 | 0.1896 | 0.1806 | 0.4327 | 0.4122 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Curry | D3 | CNE | SR | 16 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.562 |
| 2016-17 | Curry | D3 | CNE | JR | 22 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.273 |
| 2015-16 | Curry | D3 | CNE | SO | 11 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.455 |
| 2014-15 | Curry | D3 | CNE | FR | 22 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.545 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.