← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Fitzgerald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 47 2 2 4 0.085 0.0246 0.0257 0.0641 0.0670
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 43 17 21 38 0.884 0.1896 0.1806 0.4327 0.4122
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE SR 16 3 6 9 0.562
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE JR 22 2 4 6 0.273
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE SO 11 1 4 5 0.455
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE FR 22 4 8 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2014-15 · Curry
+436.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33158
Forward overall
#1317
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.