IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Morin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 48 7 17 24 0.500 0.1857 0.1926 0.5294 0.5489
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 62 8 28 36 0.581 0.2156 0.2130 0.6147 0.6071
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 57 6 21 27 0.474 0.1759 0.1651 0.5016 0.4708
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 31 10 17 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Stout
+452.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21386
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 1987
#2115
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Hellems
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Herbster
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.