IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Morin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 48 7 17 24 0.500 0.1837 0.1905 0.5278 0.5473
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 62 8 28 36 0.581 0.2133 0.2107 0.6128 0.6053
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 57 6 21 27 0.474 0.1740 0.1633 0.5000 0.4693
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 31 10 17 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Stout
+458.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27334
Forward overall
#878
Forward born in 1987
#2316
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Hellems
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Nielsen
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Roberts
Utica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.