← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Laurin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 AIK U20 SHL-J20 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.2223 0.2351 0.5330 0.5637
2016-17 AIK U20 SHL-J20 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0490 0.0492 0.1175 0.1180
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 40 11 22 33 0.825 0.3364 0.3182 0.6631 0.6272
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 24 4 6 10 0.417
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 12 7 8 15 1.250
2020-21 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast SO 7 1 2 3 0.429
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 7 1 2 3 0.429
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Plymouth State
+177.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14607
Forward overall
#668
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.