← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Laurin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 AIK U20 SHL-J20 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.2232 0.2361 0.5764 0.6096
2016-17 AIK U20 SHL-J20 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0492 0.0494 0.1271 0.1277
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 40 11 22 33 0.825 0.2325 0.2199 0.6679 0.6317
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 24 4 6 10 0.417
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 12 7 8 15 1.250
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 7 1 2 3 0.429
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Plymouth State
+284.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26444
Forward overall
#1100
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.