IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Neal Sheehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 54 13 11 24 0.444 0.2622 0.2722 1.3347 1.3854
2002-03 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 46 6 10 16 0.348 0.2052 0.2003 1.0446 1.0195
2003-04 — NAHL 52 10 24 34 0.654 0.2402 0.2247 0.6901 0.6454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 27 12 17 29 1.074
2006-07 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 29 22 24 46 1.586
2005-06 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 28 18 17 35 1.250
2004-05 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 23 4 18 22 0.957
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2004-05 · Fredonia
+419.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21484
Forward overall
#670
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.