| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Boston Jr. Rangers | EHL | 42 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.738 | 0.1584 | 0.1657 | 0.3614 | 0.3781 |
| 2015-16 | — | USPHL-Premier-Classic | 41 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.488 | 0.1465 | 0.1475 | 0.4018 | 0.4044 |
| 2016-17 | Springfield Jr. Pics | USPHL-Premier-Classic | 40 | 18 | 22 | 40 | 1.000 | 0.3003 | 0.2876 | 0.8237 | 0.7890 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | New England | D3 | — | SR | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1.250 |
| 2019-20 | New England | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 1.240 |
| 2018-19 | New England | D3 | — | SO | 30 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 0.767 |
| 2017-18 | New England | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.480 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.