IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James McIsaac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.0668 0.0753 0.2188 0.2466
2016-17 — MJHL 59 34 34 68 1.153 0.2219 0.2392 0.7268 0.7836
2017-18 Portage Terriers MJHL 58 25 28 53 0.914 0.1759 0.1811 0.5762 0.5932
2018-19 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 53 7 11 18 0.340 0.2003 0.1908 1.0200 0.9714
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 50 14 26 40 0.800 0.2683 0.2683 0.7403 0.7403
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE — 24 8 4 12 0.500
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC — 16 2 0 2 0.125
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC — 11 1 1 2 0.182
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22320
Forward overall
#1103
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Filip Jakobsson
Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
JC Humphreys
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.