IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

JC Humphreys Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 39 5 13 18 0.462 0.1301 0.1287 0.3529 0.3509
2024-25 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 45 6 14 20 0.444 0.1650 0.1554 0.4705 0.4431
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2025-26 · SUNY Cortland
+288.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27575
Forward overall
#1412
Forward born in 2004
#3186
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Erwin
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan McCormack
Canton · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Ring
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.