IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Erwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 48 8 6 14 0.292 0.0492 0.0505 0.1212 0.1245
2014-15 — NOJHL 54 16 13 29 0.537 0.0905 0.0877 0.2231 0.2162
2015-16 Iroquois Falls Eskimos NOJHL 54 26 34 60 1.111 0.1873 0.1725 0.4617 0.4252
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 25 3 2 5 0.200
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 23 4 6 10 0.435
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#32424
Forward overall
#1351
Forward born in 1995
#395
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Alarie
Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Drabin
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaymus Stevenson
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.