IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Cobbold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 33 1 8 9 0.273 0.0591 0.0661 0.2110 0.2359
2008-09 Kemptville 73's CCHL 45 13 16 29 0.644 0.1398 0.1481 0.4986 0.5283
2009-10 — CCHL 51 12 19 31 0.608 0.1318 0.1336 0.4703 0.4766
2010-11 Rockland Nationals CCHL 59 15 24 39 0.661 0.1434 0.1382 0.5114 0.4930
2011-12 — CCHL 59 28 29 57 0.966 0.2095 0.1912 0.7475 0.6822
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wentworth D3 CNE — 24 9 6 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2012-13 · Wentworth
+329.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21246
Forward overall
#771
Forward born in 1991
#398
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Tillinghast
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.