IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dallas Marvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 43 18 35 53 1.233 0.1485 0.1394 0.3894 0.3655
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 19 7 7 14 0.737
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 4 12 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2015-16 · Bethel
+436.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27939
Forward overall
#1138
Forward born in 1994
#419
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Kubat
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hollander
Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.