IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 35 11 14 25 0.714 0.1751 0.1749 0.4918 0.4912
2003-04 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 12 16 28 0.571 0.1401 0.1336 0.3934 0.3752
2004-05 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 47 11 28 39 0.830 0.2034 0.1837 0.5713 0.5161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2007-08 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 23 11 8 19 0.826
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2005-06 · SUNY Brockport
+214.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25965
Forward overall
#752
Forward born in 1984
#1218
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Watson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Rossbach
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.