← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 35 11 14 25 0.714 0.1996 0.1994 0.4929 0.4923
2003-04 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 12 16 28 0.571 0.1596 0.1522 0.3943 0.3761
2004-05 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 47 11 28 39 0.830 0.2318 0.2094 0.5726 0.5173
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Brockport D3 SR 27 8 12 20 0.741
2007-08 SUNY Brockport D3 JR 23 11 8 19 0.826
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2005-06 · SUNY Brockport
+175.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20058
Forward overall
#681
Forward born in 1984
#1491
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.