IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pat Power Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 56 8 17 25 0.446 0.1263 0.1409 0.2813 0.3139
2001-02 Dauphin Kings MJHL 39 20 27 47 1.205 0.3409 0.3600 0.7593 0.8019
2002-03 Dauphin Kings MJHL 62 32 33 65 1.048 0.2966 0.3013 0.6606 0.6710
2003-04 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 44 29 39 68 1.546 0.4372 0.4237 0.9738 0.9438
2004-05 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.2405 0.2194 0.6684 0.6099
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 18 7 2 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+93.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9413
Forward overall
#330
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Zarudny
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.