IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Erb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 31 4 4 8 0.258 0.0560 0.0569 0.1997 0.2030
2013-14 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 60 26 27 53 0.883 0.1700 0.1673 0.5570 0.5480
2014-15 Aurora Tigers OJHL 53 23 20 43 0.811 0.1988 0.1814 0.5586 0.5097
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA — 22 1 6 7 0.318
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA — 19 3 2 5 0.263
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 6 9 15 0.600
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 25 6 9 15 0.600
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC — 26 6 8 14 0.538
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 26 6 8 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2015-16 · Concordia
+257.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27482
Forward overall
#1057
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Braley
Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Thompson
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.