IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 40 13 8 21 0.525 0.1127 0.1120 0.2571 0.2555
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 15 18 33 0.805 0.1727 0.1640 0.3942 0.3744
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 22 2 2 4 0.182
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 0 8 8 0.333
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 22 8 6 14 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2016-17 · Connecticut College
+419.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28032
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 1995
#504
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Krutchensky
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Stevenson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Mathieu
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.