IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Lewis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 47 16 15 31 0.660 0.1843 0.1781 0.4552 0.4399
2012-13 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 52 22 18 40 0.769 0.2149 0.1969 0.5308 0.4865
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 26 17 15 32 1.231
2015-16 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 25 11 7 18 0.720
2014-15 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 27 9 16 25 0.926
2013-14 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 28 10 8 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2013-14 · Lake Forest
+296.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19928
Forward overall
#866
Forward born in 1992
#1477
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Donovan Hall
Neumann · 2004-05
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Domenico
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.