← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Raver Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 47 5 3 8 0.170 0.0632 0.0658 0.1802 0.1875
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 59 4 9 13 0.220 0.0818 0.0815 0.2333 0.2324
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 12 11 23 0.418 0.1553 0.1463 0.4428 0.4171
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 12 5 7 12 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 28 8 10 18 0.643
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 31 14 8 22 0.710
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 27 9 16 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+798.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35580
Forward overall
#1592
Forward born in 1996
#4495
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.