IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Selan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 30 4 5 9 0.300 0.0277 0.0275 0.0687 0.0681
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 34 10 14 24 0.706 0.0652 0.0609 0.1617 0.1509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 8 0 2 2 0.250
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 8 0 2 2 0.250
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#48011
Forward overall
#2224
Forward born in 1996
#630
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dayne Tews
Marian · 2023-24
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Johnston
Neumann · 2024-25
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Grig Kaagan
Framingham State · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.