IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dayne Tews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 38 5 5 10 0.263 0.0883 0.0905 0.2439 0.2501
2022-23 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 5 14 19 0.328 0.1099 0.1072 0.3036 0.2963
2023-24 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.1950 0.1811 0.5388 0.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA SO 24 2 5 7 0.292
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA — 23 3 3 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2024-25 · Marian
+101.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38020
Forward overall
#2368
Forward born in 2003
#1398
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hudson Cameron
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Lewis
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.