IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Cameron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0535 0.0554 0.1394 0.1444
2023-24 — SJHL 24 4 7 11 0.458 0.1324 0.1309 0.3450 0.3410
2024-25 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 53 19 34 53 1.000 0.2889 0.2700 0.7528 0.7036
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 26 6 7 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Fredonia
+172.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22105
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.