IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Gonzalez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 21 0 4 4 0.191 0.0215 0.0215 0.0648 0.0648
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0251 0.0261 0.0756 0.0786
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 19 3 4 7 0.368 0.0851 0.0856 0.2979 0.2995
2023-24 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 39 11 30 41 1.051 0.1538 0.1491 0.5155 0.4996
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 24 6 6 12 0.500
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 24 3 14 17 0.708
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2024-25 · Keene State
+568.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21381
Forward overall
#1118
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hudson Cameron
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Timpano
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.