IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jivan Sidhu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 52 2 12 14 0.269 0.0690 0.0712 0.2027 0.2092
2014-15 Coquitlam Express BCHL 53 6 12 18 0.340 0.1308 0.1275 0.4939 0.4815
2015-16 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 10 0 4 4 0.400 0.0868 0.0795 0.3064 0.2808
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wilkes D1 MAC SR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2018-19 Wilkes D1 MAC JR 23 4 2 6 0.261
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC — 23 4 2 6 0.261
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC — 24 4 5 9 0.375
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#14845
Defenseman overall
#1874
Defenseman born in 1995
#2558
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady O'Connor
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Chin
Neumann · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.