IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Chin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 39 6 5 11 0.282 0.0413 0.0408 0.1382 0.1366
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 40 10 18 28 0.700 0.1025 0.0968 0.3429 0.3238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Neumann D1 MAC JR 25 4 2 6 0.240
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 4 2 6 0.240
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#30503
Forward overall
#1210
Forward born in 1995
#971
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.