IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Oldcorn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Winkler Flyers MJHL 51 24 26 50 0.980 0.1887 0.1810 0.6182 0.5930
2001-02 Winkler Flyers MJHL 61 35 65 100 1.639 0.3156 0.2839 1.0337 0.9299
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 17 3 4 7 0.412
2004-05 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2003-04 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 16 3 4 7 0.438
2002-03 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 24 3 10 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2002-03 · Manhattanville
+160.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10777
Forward overall
#368
Forward born in 1981
#33
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.