IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Couto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 48 20 19 39 0.812 0.1991 0.2083 0.5594 0.5853
2007-08 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 48 13 21 34 0.708 0.1736 0.1738 0.4877 0.4882
2008-09 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 40 6 18 24 0.600 0.1471 0.1397 0.4131 0.3924
2009-10 — OJHL 49 28 33 61 1.245 0.3051 0.2737 0.8571 0.7690
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 22 5 8 13 0.591
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2010-11 · SUNY Potsdam
+213.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18563
Forward overall
#628
Forward born in 1989
#671
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Pickup
Concordia · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.