IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew MacKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-02-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 32 8 7 15 0.469 0.0902 0.0911 0.2956 0.2984
2003-04 Penticton Vees BCHL 50 14 13 27 0.540 0.2081 0.1997 0.7859 0.7542
2004-05 Neepawa Titans MJHL 61 23 32 55 0.902 0.1736 0.1590 0.5685 0.5206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 30 5 9 14 0.467
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 7 5 12 0.444
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 21 6 4 10 0.476
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 30 4 5 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+100.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27713
Forward overall
#802
Forward born in 1984
#363
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Ford
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Bruce
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.