IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew MacKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-02-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 32 8 7 15 0.469 0.1326 0.1339 0.2954 0.2982
2003-04 Penticton Vees BCHL 50 14 13 27 0.540 0.2102 0.2017 0.7875 0.7557
2004-05 Neepawa Titans MJHL 61 23 32 55 0.902 0.2551 0.2336 0.5681 0.5202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 30 5 9 14 0.467
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 27 7 5 12 0.444
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 21 6 4 10 0.476
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 30 4 5 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+58.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18608
Forward overall
#632
Forward born in 1984
#441
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Burke
Amherst · 2021-22
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Rust
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.