IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wiggle Kerbrat Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 41 6 5 11 0.268 0.1094 0.1069 0.2147 0.2097
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 45 29 44 73 1.622 0.3747 0.3499 0.7936 0.7410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 25 17 12 29 1.160
2021-22 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 25 5 10 15 0.600
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Wesleyan
+47.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9613
Forward overall
#434
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2008-09
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.