IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Modahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 20 5 4 9 0.450 0.2655 0.2550 1.3515 1.2978
2001-02 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 43 12 10 22 0.512 0.3018 0.2748 1.5365 1.3991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2002-03 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 15 4 7 11 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2002-03 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+221.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16198
Forward overall
#469
Forward born in 1981
#1567
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lou Educate
Nichols · 2010-11
1.556 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Rudek
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.