IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 11 4 3 7 0.636 0.1630 0.1827 0.4797 0.5377
2012-13 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 50 11 19 30 0.600 0.1537 0.1654 0.4523 0.4869
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 42 13 22 35 0.833 0.2135 0.2186 0.6281 0.6430
2014-15 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 55 18 24 42 0.764 0.1956 0.1900 0.5756 0.5590
2015-16 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 57 20 27 47 0.825 0.2113 0.1948 0.6216 0.5732
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2016-17 · Norwich
+287.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21956
Forward overall
#823
Forward born in 1995
#277
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Bottrell
Adrian · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Doyle
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.