IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Doyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 44 17 14 31 0.705 0.1727 0.1642 0.4850 0.4612
2012-13 — OJHL 35 7 16 23 0.657 0.1611 0.1452 0.4524 0.4077
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2013-14 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 15 6 21 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2013-14 · SUNY Morrisville
+569.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27966
Forward overall
#1044
Forward born in 1992
#1381
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Currie
Adrian · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Faulkner
Hobart · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Backman
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.