IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Faulkner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Merritt Centennials BCHL 55 5 32 37 0.673 0.2618 0.2529 0.9810 0.9477
2016-17 Merritt Centennials BCHL 48 5 21 26 0.542 0.2108 0.1929 0.7900 0.7228
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA — 11 1 5 6 0.545
2020-21 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 28 1 20 21 0.750
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 26 3 10 13 0.500
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 24 4 14 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2017-18 · Hobart
+266.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2946
Defenseman overall
#672
Defenseman born in 1996
#1434
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian McGilvrey
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bancroft
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.