icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian McGilvrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-14 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	—	NAHL	51	9	9	18	0.353	0.1310	0.1343	0.3737	0.3831
2012-13	Corpus Christi IceRays	NAHL	19	4	8	12	0.632	0.2345	0.2170	0.6687	0.6189

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Plymouth State	D3	LittleEast	SR	27	7	10	17	0.630
2015-16	Plymouth State	D3	LittleEast	JR	27	6	17	23	0.852
2014-15	Plymouth State	D3	LittleEast	SO	27	9	13	22	0.815
2013-14	Plymouth State	D3	LittleEast	FR	27	12	19	31	1.148

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.16

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.15

2013-14 · Plymouth State

+629.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21242

Forward overall

#921

Forward born in 1992

#2087

in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG

→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)

0.24 Average

NCAAe PPG

Ali Thomas

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG

→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)

0.19 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Will Suter

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG

→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)

0.27 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Aidan Cavallini

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG

→ Wisconsin

0.22 No data

NCAAe PPG

Perry D'Arrisso

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG

→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)

0.35 Developing

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mack Heisinger

Curry · 2014-15

0.760 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Markus Andrews

Saint Mary's · 2023-24

0.300 Developing

actual D2/3 PPG

Liam Board

Neumann · 2013-14

0.667 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.