IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian McGilvrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 51 9 9 18 0.353 0.1297 0.1329 0.3725 0.3818
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 19 4 8 12 0.632 0.2320 0.2147 0.6667 0.6170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 7 10 17 0.630
2015-16 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 6 17 23 0.852
2014-15 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 27 9 13 22 0.815
2013-14 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 27 12 19 31 1.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2013-14 · Plymouth State
+636.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27153
Forward overall
#1012
Forward born in 1992
#2291
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Board
Neumann · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mack Heisinger
Curry · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Pisciotta
Endicott · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.