IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Pisciotta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 17 5 2 7 0.412 0.0496 0.0495 — —
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 49 23 20 43 0.878 0.2635 0.2472 0.7229 0.6783
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 19 0 3 3 0.158
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 25 7 7 14 0.560
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 30 3 7 10 0.333
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 27 5 14 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2015-16 · Endicott
+389.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23586
Forward overall
#948
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Calder
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.